College Station, TX 77845-4850
979.690.1539 Email Us
Research

Publications

Peer-reviewed research and scholarly contributions

The consultants and researchers at Winfred Arthur, Jr. Consulting continue to produce work published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and well-received books. Some recent, representative, and selective publications (2000–2021) of those in the firm include:

  • Antonik, C. W., Frantz, N. B., Doverspike, D., Girouard, M., Lewis, N. J., Haidar, S. S., King, R. T., & Silva, K. T. (2021). Raising the bar: Paving the way for using AI in selection legally and ethically. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA, April, 2021, Asynchronous recorded session.
  • Harmata, R., Sherman, R. A., Winterberg, C., McKinley, S., Doverspike, D., Verona, E., & Kang, B. (2021). Good cop/bad cop: A deep dive into police officer personality. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA, April, 2021, Asynchronous recorded session.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Hagen, E., & George, F., Jr. (2021). The lazy or dishonest respondent: Detection and prevention. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 105-137.
  • Traylor, Z., Hagen, E., Williams, A. S., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2021). The testing environment as an explanation for unproctored internet testing device-type effects. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 29, 65-80.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Day, E. A. (2020). Skill decay: The science and practice of mitigating loss and enhancing retention. In P. Ward, J. M. Schraagen, J. Gore, & E. Roth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of expertise: Research and application (pp. 1085-1108). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Keiser, N. L., Atoba, O. A., Cho, I., & Edwards, B. D. (in press; 2020). Does the use of alternative predictor methods reduce subgroup differences? It depends on the construct. Human Resource Management. Online First doi:10.1002/hrm.22027
  • Doverspike, D. (2020). Turning the tides on adverse impact: Adrift in my personal raft. (A talk on the basics and changing nature of adverse impact analysis). YouTube Video. Doverspike Consulting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9idBsmkt4lc&t=3s
  • Doverspike, D. (2020). A longer brief history of testing. YouTube Video. Doverspike Consulting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0Rf6il1yMY&t=3s
  • Doverspike, D. (2020). History and basics of public sector assessment and merit-based testing. Silver Lake, OH: Doverspike Consulting. https://youtu.be/sHHAD0NtAvo
  • Keiser, N. L., & Arthur, W., Jr. (in press; 2020). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000821
  • Cubrich, M., Sodhi, K., Petruzzelli, A., & Doverspike, D. (in press, 2020). Who rescues the rescuers? Multilevel challenges facing first responder organizations. Forthcoming in Svyantek, D. (Ed), Chaos and organizations: The coronavirus and lessons for organizational theory.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Traylor, Z. (2019). Mobile assessment in personnel testing: Theoretical and practical implications. In R. N. Landers (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior (pp. 179-231). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beus, J. M., Payne, S. C., Arthur, W., Jr., & Muñoz, G. J. (2019). The development and validation of a cross-industry safety climate measure: Resolving conceptual and operational issues. Journal of Management, 45, 1987-2013.
  • Doverspike, D., & Flores, C. (2019). Becoming an Industrial-Organizational Psychologist. Oxford, England: Taylor & Francis.
  • Doverspike, D., Flores, C., & VanderLeest, J. (2019). Lifespan perspectives on personnel selection and recruitment. In B. Baltes, C. Rudolph, & H. Zacher (Eds.), Work across the lifespan (pp. 343-368). London: Academic Press/Elsevier.
  • Doverspike, D., Petruzzelli, A., & Cubrich, M. (2019). "Special issue – Call for papers: Rethinking the future police department: Examining the role of testing and assessment," Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 5(5), Article 1. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/pad/vol5/iss5/1
  • Doverspike, D., & Lawton, G. (2019). Paramedic and EMT staffing crisis prompts new organizational disciplines. Journal of Emergency Medical Services. Published online at https://www.jems.com/2019/11/14/paramedic-and-emt-staffing-crisis-prompts-new-organizational-disciplines/
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Keiser, N. L., & Doverspike, D. (2018). An information processing-based conceptual framework of the effects of unproctored internet-based testing devices on scores on employment-related assessments and tests. Human Performance, 31, 1-32.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Keiser, N. L., Hagen, E., & Traylor, Z. (2018). Unproctored internet-based device-type effects on test scores: The role of working memory. Intelligence, 67, 67-75.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Doverspike, D., Kinney, T. B., & O'Connell, M. (2017). The impact of emerging technologies on selection models and research: Mobile devices and gamification as exemplars. In J. L. Farr, & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (2nd ed., pp. 967-986). New York: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press.
  • Doverspike, D., Arthur, W., Jr., & Flores, C. (2017). Analyzing EEO disparities in pay: A primer on structuring analyses. In S. B. Morris, & E. M. Dunleavy (Eds.), Adverse impact analysis: Understanding data, statistics, and risk (pp. 197-215). New York: Routledge/Psychology Press.
  • Morelli, N. A., Potosky, P., Arthur, W., Jr., & Tippins, N. (2017). A call for conceptual models of technology in I-O psychology: An example for technology-based talent assessment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10, 634-653.
  • Highhouse, S., Doverspike, D., & Guion, R. M. (2016). Essentials of personnel assessment and selection (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Glaze, R. M., Jarrett, S. M., White, C. D., Schurig, I., & Taylor, J. E. (2014). Comparative evaluation of three situational judgment test response formats in terms of construct-related validity, subgroup differences, and susceptibility to response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 335-345.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Doverspike, D., Muñoz, G. J., Taylor, J. E., & Carr, A. E. (2014). The use of mobile devices in high-stakes remotely delivered assessments and testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22, 113-123.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Doverspike, D., Barrett, G. V., & Miguel, R. (2013). Chasing the Title VII Holy Grail: The pitfalls of guaranteeing adverse impact elimination. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 473-485.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Woehr, D. J. (2013). No steps forward, two steps back: The fallacy of trying to "eradicate" adverse impact? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 438-442.
  • Arthur, W., Jr. (2012). Dimension-based assessment centers: Theoretical perspectives. In D. J. R. Jackson, C. E. Lance, & B. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The psychology of assessment centers (pp. 95-120). New York: Routledge/Psychology Press.
  • Carpenter, J., Doverspike, D., & Miguel, R. (2012). Public service motivation as a predictor of attraction to the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 509-523.
  • Doverspike, D., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2012). The role of job analysis in test selection and development. In M. A. Wilson, W. Bennett, Jr., S. G. Gibson, & G. M. Alliger (Eds.), The handbook of work analysis in organizations: Methods, systems, applications, and science of work measurement in organizations (pp. 381-399). New York: Routledge/Psychology Press.
  • Edwards, B. D., Arthur, W., Jr., & Bruce, L., L. (2012). The three-option format for knowledge and ability multiple-choice tests: A case for why it should be more commonly used in personnel testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 65-81.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Day, E. A. (2011). Assessment centers. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Volume 2, Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 205-235). Washington, DC: APA.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Glaze, R. M. (2011). Cheating and response distortion on remotely delivered assessments. In N. T. Tippins, & S. Adler (Eds.), Technology-enhanced assessment of talent (pp. 99-152). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barrett, G. V., Miguel, R. F., & Doverspike, D. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines: Better the devil you know. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 534-536.
  • Doverspike, D., Qin, L., Magee, M. P., Snell, A. F., & Vaiana, L. P. (2011). The public sector as a career choice: Antecedents of an expressed interest in working for the federal government. Public Personnel Management, 40, 119-132.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Glaze, R. M., Villado, A. J., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). The magnitude and extent of cheating and response distortion effects on unproctored internet-based tests of cognitive ability and personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 1-16.
  • Barrett, G. V., Doverspike, D., & Young, C. (2010). The special case of public sector police and fire selection. In J. C. Scott & D, Reynolds, Handbook of Workplace Assessment: Evidence-Based practices for Selecting and Developing Organizational Talent (pp. 437-462). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Glaze, R. M., Villado, A. J., & Taylor, J. E. (2009). Unproctored internet-based tests of cognitive ability and personality: Magnitude and extent of cheating and response distortion. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 39-45.
  • Walczyk, J. J., Mahoney, K. T., Doverspike, D., & Griffith-Ross, D. A. (2009). Cognitive lie detection: Response time and consistency of answers as cues to deception. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 33-49.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Day, E. A., & Woehr, D. J. (2008). Mend it, don't end it: An alternate view of assessment center construct-related validity evidence. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 105-111.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435-442.
  • Bott, J., Ramarkrishnan, M., O'Connell, M., & Doverspike, D. (2007). Practical limitations in making decisions regarding the distribution of applicant personality tests scores based on incumbent data. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 123-134.
  • Edwards, B. D., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2007). An examination of factors contributing to a reduction in subgroup differences on a constructed-response paper-and-pencil test of scholastic achievement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 794-801.
  • Doverspike, D., Taylor, M. A., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2006). Psychological perspective on affirmative action (Paperback). NY: Novinka/Nova Science Publishers.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., & Doverspike, D. (2005). Achieving diversity and reducing discrimination in the workplace through human resource management practices: Implications of research and theory for staffing, training, and rewarding performance. In R. L. Dipboye, & A. Colella (Eds), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 305-327). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Bennett, W. Jr., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 234-245.
  • Arthur, W., Jr., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). Meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-154.
  • Woehr, D. J., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2003). The construct-related validity of assessment center ratings: A review and meta-analysis of the role of methodological factors. Journal of Management, 29, 231-258.
  • Doverspike, D. & Tuel, R. (2000). The difficult hire: Seven recruitment and selection principles for hard-to-fill positions. Manassas Park, VA: Impact Publications.